Forum

Welcome to ProjeQtOr new Forum. We migrated old forum to the new website.
You will find all your posts here, with your usual account.
Just one point : you’ll have to reinitialize your password. Use “Lost password” feature.

Usage of Admin proj...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Usage of Admin project

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3,433 Views
 Dan
(@caccia)
Posts: 340
Contributor
Topic starter
 
[#3472]

Hello,

I use an Administrative project to store all activities like holidays, training, etc. which are outside of regular project scope.
Great future in Real Work Allocation (RWA) is that all users can by default log work on this project, without needing to manually affect & assign them. :cheer:

However typical use case that I don't know how to handle is concerning holidays: sometimes (too often !) team members will leave on holidays and they forgot to log that in RWA before leaving. So the PL must correct this for end-of-month validation, by opening the Team Member's sheet and logging work.

Question is: unless I'm mistaken, if the PL is not manually affected to the Admin project, he cannot log work on holidays for the team member. Is there a way to avoid the manual affectation ?
(note: I use "Elements of own projects" for the "Access on real work allocation for resources" parameter for Project Leader)

Cheers


 
Posted : 15 Jun 2016 16H21
(@babynus)
Posts: 14952
Member Admin
 

Question is: unless I'm mistaken, if the PL is not manually affected to the Admin project, he cannot log work on holidays for the team member. Is there a way to avoid the manual affectation ?

Not it's not possible to avoid this affectation.

By default, anyone can enter his own work on RWA for Administrative projects, without having to be affected to project, nor assigned to activities.
But one cannot enter real work on these projects "for others". To gain this possibility, user must get the rights to do this, so need to get some kind of "project leader" right on the project. Otherwise, anyone would be able to enter holidays for anyone, and this would not be secured.


 
Posted : 21 Jun 2016 12H06
Share:

Scroll to Top