Forum

Welcome to ProjeQtOr new Forum. We migrated old forum to the new website.
You will find all your posts here, with your usual account.
Just one point : you’ll have to reinitialize your password. Use “Lost password” feature.

Reste négatif - Neg...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reste négatif - Negative rest

5 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
26.7 K Views
VAUCHEY
(@protion)
Posts: 138
Active Member
Topic starter
 
[#1729]

Bonjour !!
Avant tout merci pour la version 4.2.

Je voudrais savoir si il serais possible de mettre en place le fait de pouvoir avoir un reste négatif en cas de dépassement du temps assigner, et que cela ne bloque pas la fermeture de la dite activé.

Par avance merci

-----------------------------------------------------

Good morning!!
First of all thank you for version 4.2.

I would like to know if it would be possible to set up fact to be able to have a negative rest in case of overtaking of time to allocate, and that it does not block the closing of said speeded up.

Beforehand thank you


http://www.vkv.iea45.fr/

 
Posted : 28 Mar 2014 18H17
babynus
(@babynus)
Posts: 14956
Main Contributor Admin
 

No !

Realy I don't understand : how could you defined what negative left work would be ? :blink:

I can understand that left work can be less than expected one : if you work more quickly than planned.
I can understand that left work can be more than expected one : if you work more slowly than expected.
But I cannot understand what negative left work can be. :silly:


 
Posted : 28 Mar 2014 19H59
VAUCHEY
(@protion)
Posts: 138
Active Member
Topic starter
 

Re

Il me semble plus judicieux que le 'reste = l'assigné - le réel' ce qui permet de voir les activité qui sont en dépassement de temps et idem sur la ligne coût, ou sinon et t'il possible de savoir quelle partie du code il faut modifier pour cela
Par avance merci

------------------------------

It seems to me more judicious than the ' rest the allocating - the real ' what allows to see activity which are in overtaking of time and idem on the line expense, or otherwise and you it possible to know which party of code it is necessary to change for it
Beforehand thank you


http://www.vkv.iea45.fr/

 
Posted : 31 Mar 2014 11H14
babynus
(@babynus)
Posts: 14956
Main Contributor Admin
 

ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!!!!!! 👿 👿 👿 👿 👿 👿 👿 👿

Left work is ... what is left to do.
You should not try to change this behavior !!! :blink:

All the planning calculation is based on dispatching left work.
Everywhere in the application, one basis is Left Work >= 0.

Left = assigned - real, is default calculation, until resources updates lefts work (what is expected) or until left work = 0.

What you are expecting is some "work efficiency margin", that could be a new data.
But "work efficiency margin" = "assigned" - "planned" (not "assigned" - "real")

Please hae a look at http://www.projeqtor.org/index.php/forum/9-tips-tricks/5669-work-driven-project-management
It summarized good practice of work driven planning.


 
Posted : 31 Mar 2014 12H35
VAUCHEY
(@protion)
Posts: 138
Active Member
Topic starter
 

Ok sorry :sick:

Thank you Babynus


http://www.vkv.iea45.fr/

 
Posted : 31 Mar 2014 12H46
Share:

Scroll to Top