Hi,

Have you planned the pool on at least one activity? and then recalculated your project ?

no cause i don't really manage to use pool ... since more than 2 years, we ask people : don't use pool 🙂 !

i just do it for test and see that pool time is changing but contributor time is not moving ?
( they are only 2 on this pool .. ) so when i put 100h to pool it should impact availlibily of this two peoples ?

With 100% you mean that resource is fully available into this pool by day. Will she be planified on this task among resources of this pool, this day or another one, could be the real aim your are looking for...reading the Gantt once calculated or reports...

For your complete information, we would like to remind you that we are organizing a two half-day training course on February 14 and 15 to learn how to plan projects with Projeqtor. All conditions are on our site.

the pool seems to work as a complete // entity who is taken into account capacity of team when you assign it but it works only in one way ... on the other hand when my 2 contributor are full during 2 month, the pool who normaly should agregate colaborator say : disponibilties is 300h ... its wrong .. i don't planned the pool (agree) but pool is compose by 2 peoples 100% full so disponibility of pool should say me 0% of disponibilities ...
i really don't understand.

I remeneder this trouble and this is why we are not able to work with pool.
Also in planning by ressources we are not able to know the ressources taken into account by the pool for making a task.

LR

Now i understand much better ! I will have a look about that and i will come back.

You are right. Pool does not take into consideration the planified work of its resources to set its own availability. To be honest, it will be quiet difficult to implement this calculation, nevertheless it could be considered with sponsoring.

Thanks to confirm our trouble.
The only good adventage of pool is for us to assign group of people in a task.
But according this point and the fact we are not able in details planning to know the contributor taken into account by pool we are not able to use it.

Thanks for your support.
LR

This is a point we must improve.
Availability reports show availability for pools taking into account work planned on the pool only, not the work planned on the members of the pool